Upon opening Louise Perry’s new book, The Case Against the Sexual Revolution: A New Guide to Sex in the 21st Century, I’m moved to tears by the dedication:
“For the women who learned it the hard way”
Unlike many other people who have read and reviewed Perry’s work, reading her book wouldn’t be some academic exercise in contemplating how liberal feminism has let women down. It wouldn’t be evaluating what those poor sluts over there have endured in the wake of the sexual revolution. Reading her book was personal.
I’m one of those sluts.
I’m a case study for her thesis. A cautionary tale. I knew this book was going to be difficult. And it made me realize it’s time to finish this essay –– one I’ve been trying to write for four years.
It’s a tough needle to thread. I’m grateful for the ability to control my reproductive cycle and make my own money. But that freedom has come at a price. The dark side of the sexual revolution is that even though it liberated women—unyoking sex from consequences has primarily benefited men.
I was first inspired to write this piece when a 19-year-old woman I used to wait tables with asked me: “Bridget, have you ever regretted having sex with a man?”
I laughed. “Yeah. All of them.”
That’s not entirely true. There was my first love in high school. And my first husband. But if I’m honest with myself, of the dozens of men I’ve been with (at least the ones I remember), I can only think of a handful I don’t regret. The rest I would put in the category of “casual,” which I would define as sex that is either meaningless or mediocre (or both). If I get really honest with myself, I’d say most of these usually drunken encounters left me feeling empty and demoralized. And worthless.
I wouldn’t have said that at the time, though. At the time, I would have told you I was “liberated” even while I tried to drink away the sick feeling of rejection when my most recent hook-up didn’t call me back. At the time, I would have said one-night stands made me feel “emboldened.” But in reality, I was using sex like a drug; trying unsuccessfully to fill a hole inside me with men. (Pun intended.)
I know regretting most of my sexual encounters is not something a sex-positive feminist who used to write a column for Playboy is supposed to admit. And for years, I didn’t. Let me be clear, being a “slut” and sleeping with a lot of men is not the only behavior I regret. Even more damaging was what I told myself in order to justify the fact that I was disposable to these men: I told myself I didn’t care.
I didn’t care when a man ghosted me. I didn’t care when he left in the middle of the night or hinted that he wanted me to leave. The walks of shame. The blackouts. The anxiety.
The lie I told myself for decades was: I’m not in pain—I’m empowered.
Looking back, it isn’t a surprise that I lied to myself. Because from a young age, sex was something I was lied to about.
Long before I ever had sex, I felt ashamed of my natural sexual urges and awkward in my blossoming female body. Growing up Catholic, all I remember about sex was feeling bad about it before I even knew what “it” was. I only knew that sex before marriage was wrong. Even the thought of a sexual act or masturbation filled me with debilitating guilt. The first time I kissed a boy, I was convinced I’d be punished. Struck down by an angry, misogynistic God.
As I got older, I was told to guard my virginity. Well-meaning mothers and aunts were clear that I needed to withhold sex in order to get a man to love and respect me. Sex was a commodity, a priceless gem I had to hang on to that increased in value the longer I held it. It made me feel like property. And although I don’t think that was the intention of the wise women who had learned their own lessons the hard way, for me, sex became inextricably linked to my self-worth.
The shame and guilt I grew up with regarding sex felt oppressive. I resented the double standard that men could be promiscuous and it would raise their status and a woman would be slut-shamed for similar behavior. My burgeoning sexuality would unfold as a reaction to these repressive religious orthodoxies, old school notions of sexual status, and trauma.
I lost my virginity at 17 to my boss at a restaurant where I worked. And a year later, I experienced my first sexual trauma. I felt damaged and dirty and I blamed myself. Everyone responds differently to these situations—I dealt with the overwhelming shame by becoming hyper-sexual and promiscuous.
The Culture was right there to pick me up and dust me off. I doubled down on being a proud slut and internalized the biggest and most damaging lie: that loveless sex is empowering. I basked in the girl-power glow of that delusion for decades, weaponizing my sexuality while convincing myself I was full of the divine feminine.
I was full of shit.
I told myself that because I could seduce a man, I was powerful. But as Perry says in her book, “...women can all too easily fail to recognize that being desired is not the same thing as being held in high esteem.” Deep down inside, I knew that to be the case. But as a defense mechanism, I crafted a man-eater persona. My mantras were rigid.
You can either have a career or a relationship—but you can’t have both.
Intimacy is creepy.
Motherhood and children are a trap.
Sex is only about power.
Another set of lies built on lies built on trauma. Sex isn’t just about power—it’s also about intimacy and vulnerability and trust. Things I wanted nothing to do with. Because implicit in modern dating is a complete lack of expectations –– especially those of chivalry.
Whenever a man wanted to pick up the tab or pull out the chair or open the door or pick me up or take me to dinner or see me during the day or wait longer than the first date to have sex, I was shocked and suspicious of them. Was he a serial killer?
Casual sex is fraught with insecurity and miscommunication; intimacy and love are punch lines. When a man I slept with had the courtesy to reach out, I mistook relief for happiness, rewiring my brain to be grateful for the bare minimum. The saddest realization is how low I set the bar.
A lifetime of allowing myself to be the other woman, taken for granted or treated like a doormat under the false pretense of being “empowered” came to a head one night with the arrival of a text message from an on-again, off-again lover.
“Goodnight baby I love you,” it said. Quickly followed by, “Wrong person.”
Rock bottom doesn’t always look like losing everything or ending up in jail. Sometimes it can be that sick feeling in your gut when you know, emotionally, you’re done. I wanted to be able to have meaningless sex like a guy, but it didn’t work. (After years of writing for Playboy, I’ve learned it doesn’t work for a lot of men either.) For years, I tried, unsuccessfully, not to “catch the feels” (even that expression is so telling about the way emotions are viewed regarding relationships, as if they’re a cold or the flu or some kind of sickness you need to get over).
I’m not speaking for all women. I know many women with a solid sense of self who happily have loveless sex. This piece won’t make them defensive. But a lot of women will read this and bristle, just like I did, when I used to read something that pushed back on the lie I’d built my entire identity around.
Or maybe you’re a trans or nonbinary person reading this, thinking “What quaint ideas about gender and sex this old trad con has.” And to that I’ll say, it makes sense to me that the generation of young women who have experienced and borne witness to some of the worst side-effects of unyoking sex from consequence and love that Perry meticulously outlines in her book, “rough sex, hook-up culture, and ubiquitous porn”—would take a look around and decide:
I’d rather be a man. Or more accurately, I’d rather not be a woman.
But maybe it’s the inevitable conclusion to the sexual revolution. Today’s youth are being fed an even more dangerous lie than the one that I was fed about loveless sex. I was told sex doesn’t matter. They’re being told biology doesn’t matter.
This is a tragedy.
I’m not suggesting we return to some Victorian era notion of sex or some 1950s era ideal about gender roles. I’m now 43-years-old and I’m in the first truly healthy, intimate relationship in my life with my (second) husband. We recently had a daughter. And in the wake of her birth I’ve been thinking a lot about the conversations I’m going to have with her and the conversations I wish I could go back in time and have with a young Bridget.
I’d tell her:
Sex can be empowering when you’re coming from a position of healthy self-esteem. If you’re coming from a place of trauma or insecurity, casual sex won’t heal that. In fact, it might set you back and undermine any progress regarding your feelings of self-worth. If you know your value, you’re less likely to sleep with someone who doesn’t value you. Cherish yourself and you will be cherished.
You shouldn’t have to withhold sex for a man to respect you; he should respect you regardless. Sexual empowerment has nothing to do with how many people you do or don’t sleep with—it has to do with how comfortable you are in your skin—no matter your decision. It’s not about waiting until you’re in love to have sex; it’s about making sure that first, you love yourself.
Don’t ignore that nagging gut instinct telling you “sexual liberation” leaves you feeling unfulfilled. You can still be sex-positive and accept that for you, sex can’t be liberated from intimacy and a meaningful relationship.
I regret being a slut. I regret it because I regret that those men can say they slept with me.
Still, that’s how I know I finally value myself.
Every woman should feel this way: Sleeping with me is a privilege. And you have to be worthy.
Watch Bridget’s video reading the article herself, and talking about some of the feedback she's received, the assumptions people have made about the article, and her advice to the women who feel the same way.
My comment might be longer than your essay - sorry! My comments are not directed specifically at you, but rather to the issues your essay raises.
Bridget’s essay brought certain things to mind that’ I’ve wanted to say to young women for a long time. I just turned 74, so came of age in the late sixties and early seventies, just at the cusp of the so-called sexual revolution, when The Pill made it possible for women to engage in promiscuous sex, and the feminist icons of the seventies and eighties steered women in the direction of becoming [like] men.
I graduated high school in 1966. This year represented a clear dividing line between so many cultural phenomena that were dominated by sex in one form or another. In 1966 and before, a young man and woman needed a period of courtship leading to marriage before sex could take place, and then there was every expectation that sex would lead to children and the formation of a family. In my large high school class of about 300 students, only one girl became pregnant, with the result that she and the boy were required to leave school and get married. They hardly knew each other. They were ridiculed by the community for having no self control. Their parents wanted to kill them. Any future plans they had were in shambles. Everyone understood the devastating implications, and while the high school students of that era had no fewer raging hormones than young people today, their sexual activity was limited to smooching in the back of the car. They stopped short of having sex.
Before continuing, I’d like to take a step back, to put certain things in perspective. I'd like to zoom way back in space, to a point where we can see the Earth as a small, distant blue and white marble, and if we look closely, we can see patches of green. Folks, that beautiful little marble is the only place in the entire known universe where there is life. Sure, the search goes on, yadda, yadda, but to date there is not one iota of evidence of life anywhere else.
Please bring your mind to this fact, that the totality of life, from the tiniest microbe to the complexity of the human species, exists only here, in this one spot. And the fundamental drive of life is to make more of it. Life exists to make more life, and the fact that life exists at all is entirely miraculous, given the obvious challenges. In nearly every single spot on the earth, right under your very shoes, life is happening, and if you took the trouble to notice, you would find it amazing, astonishing and mind boggling. You are a piece of this life. As humans, we get to participate in life. It is a miracle and a privilege. That is the fundamental biological reason for the existence of men and women and for having sex: to make more life.
So please, show some respect for this incredible gift of life. Realize that the reason you have these raging hormones, these powerful desires to connect with your opposite, is to make more life – to participate in life. If you had a cabbage between your ears this would not seem complicated. Now, with the availability of contraceptives, you can hold off indefinitely on making more life; you can circumvent Nature. You can have sex 24/7 with strangers if you want. You can do it while drinking shots, snorting drugs and watching pornography. But is that really what you want?
Before 1967, when The Pill became widely available, men and women generally looked forward to getting married. Why? So they could have sex! In the absence of contraception, children naturally followed. Big families, food fights, barbeques, camping trips – these results of participating in life are the things that people who grew up in that era are most nostalgic about.
Has this rather natural way of living lost its appeal? Or do young people today even see it as an option? I hear young people increasingly say they don’t want children. I hear young men talking about getting vasectomies, and young women talking about sterilization. The arguments they give for these abnormal, anti-life sentiments are entirely divorced from nature. It’s as though they don’t realize that the consequence of ceasing to make life is extinction. They also say they just want to have fun; marriage and children aren’t appealing. But the joyless promiscuity of hook-up culture is appealing and fun?
Who were the role models for this lost generation? At least some of the blame for this state of affairs must be laid at the feet of feminism. The feminist ideology of the seventies and eighties persuaded women that to succeed in life they needed to be like men. Every bookstore of this era had prominent shelves filled with tomes directed at women, explaining how to think like men, dress like men, argue like men, understand about pecking orders and the sports and military influences in the workplace. This was the era of the pant suit. Women were told that every business had a glass ceiling she needed to break. The goal was to become CEO. Women pitted themselves against men in the workplace. Somehow, it was overlooked that most of these men were leading lives of quiet desperation in their paper-pushing jobs, and that maybe corporate America wasn’t the ideal environment for a woman looking to make her mark. Women kept on banging their heads against the glass ceiling and complaining about misogyny. This still goes on today. It occurred to very few of them that if they wanted so very much to be a CEO, they could just go start their own company and put their money where their mouths were. No head banging required.
So, after this decades-long war of women against men, we’ve now arrived at the bizarre state of affairs where women are, in fact, declared to be men, and vice versa, and/or none of the above, or all of the above. Well intentioned people sincerely declare that they cannot define what a woman is, other than to say it is a body with a vagina. The gender ideology wars have become incomprehensible babble, with many people apparently swearing off sex altogether. And perhaps that is a good thing. Probably people should get their genders sorted out before they go back to making more life. Before a woman can have any self-respect, she must at least know she is a woman. Not being a slut has to start there. "A body with a vagina" has "slut" written all over it.
I would like to make the argument that life is a good thing, and that participating in life is good for humans. And I would further argue that men and women, in the old-fashioned meaning of the words, are a good thing, and that sex, carried out joyfully, with love, passion, humor and commitment, the old-fashioned way, is a good thing. There is a simple cure for those who have gotten too far lost in the labyrinths of their own minds: nature. Nature knows how to do life, in all its diversity. So, if you regret being a slut, or some version of that, get out of your bubble, go for a walk in a wild place, hug a tree, get grounded and have a look at how Nature is doing life. There are no lies in nature; you will always get the truth. You will feel better. Things will make more sense. You might turn over a new leaf.
This resonated SOO much! Growing up (fast lol) in the 80’s and raising my girls in the 90’s....and now at 55, single and on a healing journey, I’m waking to my “damage” and internal dialogue, and working on REPROGRAMMING! I’ve literally been meditating on this over past year! Thank you for your frank and raw honesty! 💚🌎